Some finitely additive versions of the strong law of large numbers
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A Note on the Strong Law of Large Numbers
Petrov (1996) proved the connection between general moment conditions and the applicability of the strong law of large numbers to a sequence of pairwise independent and identically distributed random variables. This note examines this connection to a sequence of pairwise negative quadrant dependent (NQD) and identically distributed random variables. As a consequence of the main theorem ...
متن کاملGame-theoretic versions of Kolmogorov’s strong law of large numbers
We prove two variants of Kolmogorov’s strong law of large numbers in a completely worst-case framework, eschewing any probabilistic assumptions. The first variant is an assertion about a game involving the Bookmaker predicting the values of unprobabilized random variables; in an intuitive sense it is much stronger than the usual strong law of large numbers for martingales. The second variant is...
متن کاملOn the strong law of large numbers and additive functions
Let f(n) be a strongly additive complex-valued arithmetic function. Under mild conditions on f , we prove the following weighted strong law of large numbers: if X, X1, X2, . . . is any sequence of integrable i.i.d. random variables, then lim N→∞ ∑N n=1 f(n)Xn ∑N n=1 f(n) = EX a.s.
متن کاملMARCINKIEWICZ-TYPE STRONG LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS FOR DOUBLE ARRAYS OF NEGATIVELY DEPENDENT RANDOM VARIABLES
In the following work we present a proof for the strong law of large numbers for pairwise negatively dependent random variables which relaxes the usual assumption of pairwise independence. Let be a double sequence of pairwise negatively dependent random variables. If for all non-negative real numbers t and , for 1 < p < 2, then we prove that (1). In addition, it also converges to 0 in ....
متن کاملOn the Strong Law of Large Numbers
N lim 1( 1: f(nkx)) = 0, N-N k_l or roughly speaking the strong law of large numbers holds for f(nkx) (in fact the authors prove that Ef(nkx)/k converges almost everywhere) . The question was raised whether (2) holds for any f(x) . This was known for the case nk=2k( 2) . In the present paper it is shown that this is not the case . In fact we prove the following theorem . THEOREM 1 . There exist...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Israel Journal of Mathematics
سال: 1976
ISSN: 0021-2172,1565-8511
DOI: 10.1007/bf02834755